The Fairness Of Minimising Liability In Tort
Tort imposes a number of criteria, which must be satisfied before a party can be liable for his negligent actions. These are naturally strict to avoid the potential economic crisis arising from a 'compensation culture'. Additionally, there is a pressure to encourage risk to a certain extent in order to promote economic activity, and to avoid easily conceding liability to encourage 'normal' daily activity. In a weak tort system, paranoia hinders economic growth and creates a multitude of socio-economic problems. From this, the conditions of indeterminate liability have arisen, as well as numerous other high standards that must be satisfied before a court will impose liability and the corresponding financial repercussions. Imagine the scenario where a protruding paving stone causes an actual risk of injury to the public at large. Because there is a potential for such a widespread liability, courts around the world impose various mechanisms to rule out claims of any sort to avoid the potential for ruining local authorities and in the interests of 'common sense'. In much of Europe and the UK, the mechanism of choice is a 'remoteness criterion', which provides that where the liability for the victim's injury is too 'remote', no liability shall be borne. In other words, there is a requirement that the potentially liable party should have had a direct impact on the specific victims injury. Another argument against the principle of precluding liability on this basis is that it encourages 'bigger' tort. In this sense, it ensures more caution towards situations where a specific person may be injured, but also encourages a lack of consideration for safety in situations where hundreds or potentially thousands may be subject to injury, given the unlikely possibility of successful legal challenge. This creates an obvious social problem, which must be weighed by legislatures and courts in order to solve the problem. As this area of the law continues to develop, the importance of finding a workable solution to this situation will become more apparent. Ultimately, in the scenario envisaged above, an injury from the paving stone could happen to anyone using the pathway, thus there could be no liability because the injury would be too remote. Although an effective means of achieving the ends, doubts have been cast as to the fairness of indeterminate liability, particularly in consideration of victims of real injury in these circumstances who would otherwise be entitled to compensation in respect of the damages sustained. In protecting the potentially liable, the relevant courts are unjustifiably prejudicing the victims of injury. Perhaps it can be seen as the lesser of two evils, but this is poor consolation for the victims of this sort of injury. Arguably a better mechanism for dealing with this sort of situation would be to present a 'first come first serve' basis, or to create a common indemnity fund, or compulsory insurance for organisations likely to be subject to multiple tort claims. This would help curb the apparent inequity in tort claims where liability is precluded by virtue of its wide-ranging effects. |
Sponsored Ads:Related Articles:
Government / Human Rights Vs Civil Liberties In Europe Patent / Patent Protection Trademark / Shopnbc Credit Card Trademark: Protecting You From Credit Card Fraud Criminology / Experiencing The Parallels Between Victimology And Criminology Paralegal / California Paralegals American History / The Boston Tea Party Trademark / Trademark Jewelry Shopping At Shopnbc: Knowing The Latest Maximum Bid (Cst) Patent / Trifari Patents Paralegal / Paralegal Jobs Lawyers / A Few New York Lawyers To Choose From Attourneys / Denver Attorneys Fight For Freedom And Liberty Patent / Patent Law Firms Paralegal / Paralegal / Paralegal Studies Trademark / The Naming Game Of The Trademark Name Also In This Category:
Government - The Trust Mechanism - Hillary Clinton'S Presidential Campaign - National Budget - Advantages Of Federalism - Who Is Barack Obama? - Racial Segregation In Politics - Contract Formation - The Concept Of Ownership - Tackling International Litigation - Human Rights Vs Civil Liberties In Europe - Alienation Of Assets - Children And Violence - Internet And Politics - Unemployment Rates - The Agency Relationship Currently Online :9 member(s), 28 guest(s): DarkTrinket, Gothicbunny, Heat2010, Hippie, Jake, John30, Moby, Orangedog, SecretCelebrity, Crawler, Gigabot, Google, MSN.com, Cobion.com, Slurp Search : |
No comments yet
martin assistant subjects marks academic select justice status slave spirit issued offered tasks scho need society wheat rules certificate careers theory covered analytical place usually following first medicine higher marriages administrator dream customer sure action hard truly equal environment presidency handle att avoid attorneys sexual regulates native berry refusal tubman back